The Forgotten Brother Speaks
The short epistle of Jude, often buried behind the longer letters of Paul or the thunderous visions of Revelation, is in fact one of the most urgent and subversive texts in the entire New Testament canon.
The short epistle of Jude, often buried behind the longer letters of Paul or the thunderous visions of Revelation, is in fact one of the most urgent and subversive texts in the entire New Testament canon.
It is not addressed to Gentiles looking for grace, nor to philosophers seeking wisdom, but to a remnant—a remnant in danger of being infiltrated — a perennial threat in spiritual terms.
This epistle is not polite. It is not pastoral. It is apocalyptic, adversarial, and deeply Jewish.
And it may very well be the final warning from Jesus’ family itself before the full distortion of His mission took root.
⸻
Jude’s Identity: Brother, Resister, Defender
Jude opens his letter humbly: “Jude, a servant of Jesus the Messiah, and brother of James.” He is also known as Yehuda HaHasid or Thaddeus-Jude the Issacharite.
Jude opens his letter humbly: “Jude, a servant of Jesus the Messiah, and brother of James.” He is also known as Yehuda HaHasid or Thaddeus-Jude the Issacharite.
He does not pull rank. But early Jewish-Christian memory (cf. Mark 6:3, Matthew 13:55 ) places him in the family line—Jude, brother of James the Just, son of Mary, cousin or brother of Jesus himself.
To read this letter as anything less than a familial intervention is to miss its urgency.
Jude is writing from within the house of Israel, within the house of David, and possibly within the literal house of Nazareth. He is writing to warn.
⸻
⸻
Why Jude Matters Now
In the 50s Jude’s world was collapsing. A new movement was emerging—one that used the name of Jesus but was, in Jude’s words, “perverting the grace of God into licentiousness and denying our only Master and Lord” (Jude 4). These infiltrators were not pagans. They were insiders. They claimed revelation. They trafficked in esoteric knowledge. They were, as Jude says, “hidden reefs” (Jude 12), “clouds without water,” “wandering stars for whom the blackest darkness has been reserved forever” (Jude 13).
In the 50s Jude’s world was collapsing. A new movement was emerging—one that used the name of Jesus but was, in Jude’s words, “perverting the grace of God into licentiousness and denying our only Master and Lord” (Jude 4). These infiltrators were not pagans. They were insiders. They claimed revelation. They trafficked in esoteric knowledge. They were, as Jude says, “hidden reefs” (Jude 12), “clouds without water,” “wandering stars for whom the blackest darkness has been reserved forever” (Jude 13).
This is not just moral outrage. This is theological warfare.
⸻
Enoch, Balaam, and the Apocalyptic Horizon
Jude makes two explosive references: one to Balaam, and one to Enoch. Both are essential for understanding the polemic.
Jude makes two explosive references: one to Balaam, and one to Enoch. Both are essential for understanding the polemic.
Balaam: in Numbers 22–24, is the false prophet par excellence—a man hired to curse Israel, whose words were twisted into blessings, but whose legacy was seductive compromise. Jude accuses his enemies of “rushing headlong into the error of Balaam” (Jude 11). This is a direct accusation: the infiltrators are teaching covenantal compromise cloaked in revelation.
Enoch: Jude’s quotation from 1 Enoch (Jude 14–15) shocks many readers:
“Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His holy ones…”
This is not Scripture in the canonical sense. And Jude never says it is. But he uses it as a popular frame, a literary device well-known in the 1st-century Jewish world, to illustrate the coming judgment on the wicked. Just as Paul quoted pagan poets in Athens, Jude quotes Enoch—not as divine authority, but as illustrative resonance.
We may affirm this use without endorsing the Watchers’ theology embedded in Enochic literature. Titus 1:14 warns not to give heed to “Jewish myths” (μύθοι Ἰουδαϊκοί)—a likely reference to pseudepigraphal and apocalyptic elaborations like those found in the Enochian corpus.
⸻
⸻
Jude and the Teliya: A First-Century Response
Behind Jude’s fiery rhetoric may lie a deeper tradition—the early Jewish counter-narrative of the Teliya (תלייה), the “hanging” of the impostor Yeshu. Jude’s warnings about infiltrators, about those who “deny the Master,” about “ungodly men,” align not with Roman persecution narratives but with internal Jewish trauma.
Behind Jude’s fiery rhetoric may lie a deeper tradition—the early Jewish counter-narrative of the Teliya (תלייה), the “hanging” of the impostor Yeshu. Jude’s warnings about infiltrators, about those who “deny the Master,” about “ungodly men,” align not with Roman persecution narratives but with internal Jewish trauma.
In this frame, Jude is not just warning Gentile converts about Gnosticism or libertinism—he is exposing a movement that stole the Name (the Shem haMeforash), performed wonders through sorcery, and led the people into sedition against Torah and Temple.
⸻
Closing: Trusting the Brothers Again
Jude’s epistle is a call not to abandon the gospel, but to rescue it—to return to the faith once delivered, not the version once co-opted.
Jude’s epistle is a call not to abandon the gospel, but to rescue it—to return to the faith once delivered, not the version once co-opted.
The early family of Jesus—James, Jude, Simon, and their followers—did not capitulate to sorcery or empire. They contended. They fought. And Jude left us a record.
Jude is not what you expect.
He’s not the betrayer.
He’s not the legalist.
He’s not the fringe.
He is the brother.
The guardrail.
The last voice of fidelity before the break.
While others universalized the message, Jude localized the warning.
He didn’t preach rebellion—he exposed infiltration.
He didn’t abandon Torah—he defended its integrity.
Jude is the canary in the coal mine of apostolic memory.
