Jude’s Recovery of the Name
Under cover of night, when the impostor (often associated with Yeshu in the Talmudic Baraitas) and his small circle of followers had drunk wine mixed with a potion of forgetfulness, God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the mamzer, the false claimant to messianic authority.
Into this moment of divine orchestration, Jude—known in this tradition as Yehudah ben Zechariah—stepped forth. Sent as an agent of truth by the Sanhedrin and the king (Herod Agrippa II, convinced in part by Paul’s testimony but loyal to the Jewish covenant), Jude moved with deliberate precision.
While the mamzer slept, Jude entered the tent. He bore with him not the sword of bloodshed but the knife of covenantal surgery. Quietly, he cut into the flesh of the impostor, removing a hidden parchment or tattoo—the sacred Name (Shem HaMeforash), which the impostor had illicitly taken possession of.
This theft of the Name by the impostor had been the source of his false miracles, his seduction of the simple-minded, and his claim to divine status. Without it, he was powerless.
The impostor awoke in terror, sensing that something precious had been taken. In despair, he uttered a dark lament—an inversion of the Messiah’s cry from Psalm 22—declaring that his heavenly patron had forsaken him. But in this tradition, it was not a divine abandonment of a true son, but the just stripping away of a thief’s stolen authority.
Jude then withdrew secretly and reported to the elders. The people rejoiced in holy relief, realizing that the Name had been recovered and the breach against heaven repaired.
This event, so understated in the rabbinic retellings, carries immense covenantal meaning: The Name is not magic. The Name is a sacred trust. And it belongs not to self-appointed wonder-workers but to the true covenant people who hallow it by living in obedience and awe.
Why Must Christian Believers Pay Attention to These Jewish Texts?
As They are Often attached to Claims by Anti- Talmud Accusers
When many Christians first hear of the Talmud’s references to Jesus, they are often told only two things:
(1) That the Talmud “hates” Jesus, and
(2) That it “proves” how evil Judaism is.
Both statements are misleading — and dangerous. The real story is far more complex. And, ironically, by dismissing these traditions, believers have cut themselves off from some of the most important confirmations of the biblical record.
The baraita in Sanhedrin 43a, which records the trial and execution of “Yeshu” and his five disciples, should not be feared. It should be studied.
Sanhedrin 43a independently confirms that there was:
• A public trial
• A lengthy waiting period (40 days for evidence!)
• Charges involving sorcery and leading Israel astray
• Execution by stoning and then hanging (not crucifixion in Roman style)
• A public trial
• A lengthy waiting period (40 days for evidence!)
• Charges involving sorcery and leading Israel astray
• Execution by stoning and then hanging (not crucifixion in Roman style)
This record shows a divided Jewish world — where early believers like Jude, James, and Peter were trying to preserve faithfulness to God while opposing distortions of it.
Some Jews opposed him as a sorcerer.
Some Jews followed him as the Messiah.
Some Jews (like Jude) sought to expose impostors who misused Jesus’ name.
The Talmudic concern about the use of the Shem haMeforash (the Divine Name) shows that the real scandal wasn’t mere teaching or healing — it was the misuse of the sacred name which Jesus affiremd in the prayer he taught His disciples.
If early followers like Jude, James, and Peter worked to guard the faith — And if later followers (especially Gentiles) lost contact with this battle — Then Christianity’s early slide into Gnosticism and heresy makes sense.
The baraitot in Sanhedrin are not an “enemy testimony.” They are a witness from the family of faith — a family wrestling to stay faithful amidst seduction, betrayal, and confusion.
This early Jewish memory gives us four essential reasons to take it seriously:
1. Independent Jewish Confirmation of Key Events
It shows that this Yeshu’s death was perceived as a Torah issue, not merely a political one.
In other words: The rabbis confirm that Yeshu was judged as a false prophet according to Deuteronomy 13 — precisely the warning Jesus himself gave about false Messiahs that would come after Him.
2. A Clearer Picture of the Internal Jewish Struggle
Rather than being simply “the Jews killed Jesus,” the reality was perpetuated in various forms that show that this was NOT Jesus of Nazareth:
This matches exactly the New Testament world. Think Acts 5, Acts 21-23, and even Romans 9-11.
3. A Testimony to the Gravity of the “Name Theft”
This fits exactly why Jesus taught, “Hallowed be Thy Name” — it was not superstition, but the central pillar of covenant life.
Jude’s intervention — stealing back the misused Name — was a necessary purification.
The Talmud’s memory hints at this without fully spelling it out. This is the main point and thus it could never be something that could attributed to Jesus of the Gospels
4. A Frame for Understanding Christian Apostasy
By ignoring these Jewish memories, Christians forgot why fidelity to the God of Israel mattered.
Thus, the preservation of the Teliya tradition becomes part of the true “Trail of Blood” that keeps the original calling visible — against false spiritualization.
Rather than fear these texts, true Christian believers should study them, honor them, and learn from them. They confirm, rather than deny, the depth of the battle Jude fought—and that we must continue today.
Key theological reason why a Christian should believe this story:
Continuity with Scripture: Jude in his Epistle speaks of ancient rebellion against divine order—Cain, Balaam, Korah. The early infiltration and counterfeit narratives match precisely the dynamics he warned against.
Continuity with Scripture: Jude in his Epistle speaks of ancient rebellion against divine order—Cain, Balaam, Korah. The early infiltration and counterfeit narratives match precisely the dynamics he warned against.
Hallowed be Thy Name: Jesus’ own prayer emphasizes sanctifying God’s Name. The NT echoes the critical importance of the Name being pure, not manipulated.
A Jewish fight for faithfulness: Jude’s actions were not betrayal; they were faithfulness to the true Messiah and to Israel’s mission. He stands in continuity with Phinehas, with Elijah, with the prophets who refused to let covenant be perverted.
⸻
Sources behind this narration:
Sources behind this narration:
- Sanhedrin 43a, 67a – Regarding the trial, conviction, and execution of Yeshu and his disciples.
- Gittin 57a – Referring to the punishment and fate of the body.
- Medieval “Toledot Yeshu” traditions – which expanded on the Baraita with vivid accounts of the Name’s theft and Jude’s retrieval.- Sha’ar HaGilgulim (Isaac Luria) – alludes to burial locations and mystical consequences.
