Travis Snow is an ambitious voice in biblical eschatology, Jewish-Christian relations, and Middle Eastern affairs. His work attempts to bridge prophecy, theology, and modern geopolitics, much like his apparent mentor, Joel Richardson. However, while Richardson has carved out a niche within Christian eschatology, Snow seems to operate in his shadow, adopting many of the same faulty presuppositions but with even less theological and historical depth.
His recent pronouncement that he is the Department of Eschatology for the Trump Administration is a clear example of the kind of flippancy that undermines the weight of the subjects he claims to handle.
This critique is not meant to dismiss his work outright but to encourage a more measured and mature approach—one that respects the depth of Jewish and Christian traditions rather than rushing into declarations that lack historical and theological grounding.
⸻
1. The Jewish Reality: Wisdom Comes With Time
One of the most glaring issues with Snow’s approach is the assumption that theological understanding is something one can master quickly. In Jewish tradition, this is simply not how things work.
One of the most glaring issues with Snow’s approach is the assumption that theological understanding is something one can master quickly. In Jewish tradition, this is simply not how things work.
Rabbis do not pass on the deepest things of God to just anyone, nor do they grant authority to those who have not proven themselves through years—often decades—of study and refinement. In traditional Jewish practice, a person does not even begin to handle the weightiest aspects of the Torah and its mysteries until they reach 40 years of age, the point at which they are considered mature enough to grasp its depths. Even then, they are still students, spending years wrestling with new materials before they even consider teaching others.
Contrast this with what has become the norm in parts of American Christianity—young men fresh out of Bible school who believe they have all the answers, launching ministries, writing books, and building YouTube followings as self-proclaimed authorities. This problem is not limited to one theological camp.
On one end, we see the Young, Restless, and Reformed (Theo Bros), who quickly adopt rigid systematic theology and act as if they have resolved every doctrinal debate in church history. On the other end, we have figures like Snow, who assume that a few years of study on Israel, prophecy, and geopolitics make them eschatological experts.
But the truth is, theology—especially eschatology—is a lifelong pursuit. The deeper one goes, the more one realizes how much more there is to learn. There is a certain humility required to approach these subjects properly, a humility that is lacking in much of today’s influencer-driven theology.
Snow’s work would be far stronger if he embraced this principle. Rather than rushing to establish himself as an authority, he would do well to step back, study under seasoned scholars, and allow time to refine his understanding.
⸻
2. A Misguided Understanding of Jewish Identity and Festivals
Another area where Snow stumbles is in his handling of Jewish identity and tradition. He appears to lean heavily into his Jewish ancestry as a credential for his authority, but Jewish heritage alone does not automatically grant theological insight.
Jewishness Is Not a Theological Trump Card
Many people have Jewish ancestry, but that does not mean they have a unique or authoritative interpretation of Scripture. True Jewish scholarship is marked by rigorous study, not mere bloodline. Some of the greatest Jewish scholars in history would likely disagree with many of Snow’s conclusions, precisely because he does not engage with the full depth of Jewish exegesis.
His Understanding of the Jewish Festivals Is Surface-Level
Snow often speaks about the Jewish feasts—particularly Passover—as if they stand in direct contrast to Christianity and Islam. But his framing of these topics lacks nuance. Rather than seeing Passover as a signpost pointing to the fulfillment of Israel’s promises in the Messiah, he seems to use it as a way to create stark divisions. This is an approach that many young voices in this space adopt, and it does little to foster meaningful engagement.
If he truly wants to handle Jewish-Christian relations well, he needs to spend time deeply studying the rabbis, the Second Temple Jewish context of the New Testament, and early Christian interpretations of Israel’s festivals—not simply using them as rhetorical tools to set his views apart from others.
⸻
3. Premature Dogmatism in Eschatology
Eschatology is a field that requires patience, historical awareness, and theological precision. Yet, Snow often speaks as if he has already unlocked the mysteries of biblical prophecy, declaring his views with a level of certainty that is unwarranted.
One of the biggest dangers in eschatology is treating prophecy like a puzzle to be solved rather than a divine mystery to be received. Many throughout church history have fallen into the trap of trying to pinpoint geopolitical fulfillments of prophecy, only to see their predictions fail and their interpretations crumble. Snow risks following this same path by tying biblical eschatology too closely to modern politics, especially with his claims about his role in the Trump administration.
The reality is that eschatology is not about predicting the next political shift or identifying the next world leader. It is about understanding the unfolding of God’s redemptive plan for creation. While geopolitics plays a role in that plan, it is not the centerpiece of biblical prophecy. Snow would do well to take a step back and recognize that eschatology is about far more than modern political movements—it is about the cosmic reign of the Messiah and the restoration of all things.
⸻
4. The Dangers of Politicized Theology
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Snow’s approach is his increasing entanglement of faith with political ideology. His alignment with the Trump administration—especially his claim to be its “Department of Eschatology”—exposes a deep flaw in his theological approach.
The Gospel Is Not a Political Movement
The kingdom of God does not rise or fall with any human government. It is not tied to nationalism, partisan politics, or the success of any particular administration. When theology becomes a tool of political ideology, it loses its prophetic edge and becomes a servant of power rather than a witness to the truth.
Biblical Eschatology Is Bigger Than American Politics
Snow’s framing of prophecy seems to revolve too much around contemporary American concerns. But biblical eschatology is not American eschatology. The kingdom of God transcends nations, and its fulfillment is not dependent on who holds office in Washington, D.C.
Nationalism and Eschatology Are a Dangerous Mix
Snow’s rhetoric risks blending biblical prophecy with nationalist sentiment, something that history has repeatedly shown to be dangerous. Whether it was Rome, medieval Christendom, or modern political movements, every time people have tried to merge kingdom theology with earthly power, it has led to theological distortion.
Snow would benefit from taking a step back and asking: Am I interpreting Scripture, or am I reading my political context into it? A more seasoned theologian would recognize the dangers of this approach and work to keep eschatology grounded in God’s eternal purposes rather than contemporary power struggles.
⸻
Conclusion: A Call to Maturity and Humility
Travis Snow has potential, but his current trajectory is marked by the pitfalls of youth: premature authority, overconfidence in his interpretations, and an entanglement with politics that distorts theology. His understanding of Jewish identity and practice, his eschatology, and his approach to prophecy all need refinement.
This is not to say he should abandon his work—but he should slow down. Rather than declaring himself an expert, he should embrace the wisdom of waiting, of learning, of sitting under those who have studied these matters for decades. The Jewish reality is that true wisdom is passed down over time, not granted overnight. If Snow wants to handle these subjects well, he should take a season to step back, listen, and grow in his understanding.
A more mature Travis Snow could contribute meaningfully to the conversation. But to do so, he must resist the urge to be the loudest voice in the room and instead seek the depth and wisdom that comes only with time.
