Covenant and Heavenly Flesh:
Not Just Fulfillment
The Vision That Defines Dominion
Daniel 7:13–14 offers one of the most exalted revelations in all of Scripture:
Daniel 7:13–14 offers one of the most exalted revelations in all of Scripture:
“I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. He was given authority, glory, and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.”¹
This is not merely an apocalyptic snapshot of the end—it is a covenantal unveiling of God’s eternal order. Daniel’s vision stands at the intersection of heaven and history, Jewish imagination and divine self-disclosure. It declares not simply what will happen, but who truly rules, how dominion is bestowed, and what humanity is called to be before God.
⸻
Why “Son of Man” Is the Exact Deity Statement of Jesus
In the Gospels, Jesus repeatedly calls Himself the Son of Man.² He does not self-identify as Son of David nor allow political or messianic categories to define Him. This is intentional. By using Daniel’s title, He identifies Himself as the One who:
In the Gospels, Jesus repeatedly calls Himself the Son of Man.² He does not self-identify as Son of David nor allow political or messianic categories to define Him. This is intentional. By using Daniel’s title, He identifies Himself as the One who:
• Receives worship (pelach in Aramaic), a term used only for God.³
• Holds eternal dominion, unlike the beastly kingdoms that rise and fall.
• Approaches the Ancient of Days, not as petitioner but as participant in divine rule.
Thus, Jesus’ self-designation is not a modest claim to humanity but a covenantal claim to divinity. In Daniel’s categories, “Son of Man” conveys far more than “Son of God,” which could still imply a royal or prophetic role. The Son of Man shares the very throne of God—He is the Presence enthroned.
⸻
Covenant Charter, Not Prophetic Countdown
Modern interpreters—whether dispensational futurists or triumphalist idealists—often reduce Daniel 7 to an eschatological timeline.⁴ But Daniel’s vision is not primarily predictive; it is constitutive. It defines the covenantal pattern of God’s governance:
Modern interpreters—whether dispensational futurists or triumphalist idealists—often reduce Daniel 7 to an eschatological timeline.⁴ But Daniel’s vision is not primarily predictive; it is constitutive. It defines the covenantal pattern of God’s governance:
Covenantal Contrast: The beasts are empires that devour and dehumanize, breaking covenant. The Son of Man represents renewed covenant humanity—faithful, entrusted with dominion.Present Application: Jesus’ resurrection and ascension are not mere preludes to some later event; they are the covenant’s decisive enthronement.⁵Future Horizon: His authority will reach its consummation when creation itself is restored, yet that rule is already manifest wherever obedience of faith takes root.
Daniel 7 thus serves as the charter of redeemed humanity: the faithful Man ruling in perfect unity with God.
⸻
Jewish and Christian Convergence
This reading restores the integrity of both Jewish and Christian traditions:
This reading restores the integrity of both Jewish and Christian traditions:
In Jewish vision, the Son of Man symbolizes Israel’s vindication and restored dominion after oppression.⁶In Christian confession, Jesus embodies this vindication personally—He is Israel faithful and glorified.
Rather than collapsing one into the other, the covenantal reading preserves the tension: Jesus does not replace Israel; He carries Israel’s kingship into eternity.
⸻
⸻
The Sanhedrin and the Memory of Acher
1. Guarding Heaven’s Unity
The Sanhedrin of Jesus’ day remembered well the trauma of Acher—Elisha ben Abuyah—whose mystical speculation led to charges of “two powers in heaven.”⁷ Anything resembling duality was seen as blasphemy. The guardians of Torah preferred to err on the side of unity, even if it meant rejecting revelation.
The Sanhedrin of Jesus’ day remembered well the trauma of Acher—Elisha ben Abuyah—whose mystical speculation led to charges of “two powers in heaven.”⁷ Anything resembling duality was seen as blasphemy. The guardians of Torah preferred to err on the side of unity, even if it meant rejecting revelation.
2. Jesus and the Dangerous Claim
When Jesus quoted Daniel 7 before the high priest—“You will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven” (Mark 14:62)—He entered the Acher zone deliberately.⁸ To them, this was a claim to equality with God, not messiahship in the political sense. The priest tore his garments; heaven, they thought, was being split open.
When Jesus quoted Daniel 7 before the high priest—“You will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven” (Mark 14:62)—He entered the Acher zone deliberately.⁸ To them, this was a claim to equality with God, not messiahship in the political sense. The priest tore his garments; heaven, they thought, was being split open.
3. Theological Stakes
• Guarding the Shema: Any perceived rival to YHWH was intolerable.• Guarding Covenant Authority: A heavenly-enthroned Galilean undermined rabbinic mediation.• Guarding Torah Identity: If Jesus was truly Sar ha-Panim—the Prince of the Presence—then Torah itself was being fulfilled, not abolished, in Him.⁹
4. Why Jesus Was No Acher
Acher mistook vision for rivalry and “cut the shoots.”¹⁰ Jesus, the true Netzer—the faithful Shoot—entered heaven not as a second power but as the very Face (Panim) of the One God. He did not divide the divine; He unveiled its covenantal depth.
Acher mistook vision for rivalry and “cut the shoots.”¹⁰ Jesus, the true Netzer—the faithful Shoot—entered heaven not as a second power but as the very Face (Panim) of the One God. He did not divide the divine; He unveiled its covenantal depth.
5. The Offense of the Son of Man
Messianic claimants came and went, tolerated as political risks. But one who claimed to sit at the right hand of Power was intolerable. For the Sanhedrin, this was theological dynamite. Yet in truth, Jesus was not fragmenting the Godhead; He was revealing the covenantal unity between the Ancient of Days and the Human One.
⸻
Messianic claimants came and went, tolerated as political risks. But one who claimed to sit at the right hand of Power was intolerable. For the Sanhedrin, this was theological dynamite. Yet in truth, Jesus was not fragmenting the Godhead; He was revealing the covenantal unity between the Ancient of Days and the Human One.
⸻
Mashiach and Moshiach: The Covenant of Presence
Two Hebrew titles converge in Him:
Two Hebrew titles converge in Him:
• Mashiach (מָשִׁיחַ): The anointed Davidic King, ruling in justice and peace.¹¹
• Moshiach (מוֹשִׁיעַ): The Savior-Deliverer, restoring creation’s order.¹²
Both are fulfilled in Yeshua Sar ha-Panim—the Prince of the Presence. In Jewish liturgy, this angelic title refers to the radiant Face of the Most High who bears the Name and executes divine judgment.¹³ In Jesus, this is not a mere intermediary; the Presence becomes personal. He does not reflect divinity; He is divinity embodied.
⸻
⸻
The Heavenly Flesh
This embodiment reveals the ancient mystery of heavenly flesh—the union of divine reality and human materiality first glimpsed in Adam Kadmon, the primordial Man.¹⁴
This embodiment reveals the ancient mystery of heavenly flesh—the union of divine reality and human materiality first glimpsed in Adam Kadmon, the primordial Man.¹⁴
Jesus is the Second Adam, the perfected image touching the sons of Seth, restoring the spiritual lineage that Luke traces to the very beginning.¹⁵
His flesh is not from below but from above—flesh transfigured, not abolished.
Where Acher “cut the shoots,” Jesus grafted them back.
Where Adam fell from glory, the Son of Man ascended with glorified humanity.
Where heaven and earth were estranged, covenantal flesh now binds them forever.
⸻
Dominion Redeemed
Daniel’s vision closes the circle of covenant history. Humanity’s lost vocation is restored: dominion exercised not through beastly power but through faithful sonship.
Daniel’s vision closes the circle of covenant history. Humanity’s lost vocation is restored: dominion exercised not through beastly power but through faithful sonship.
The Son of Man—heavenly yet human—embodies the destiny of all creation.
History belongs not to the beasts, but to the Human One.
Authority belongs not to empire, but to covenantal faithfulness.
Glory belongs to Him whose flesh and Spirit are one—
Yeshua, the Son of Man, the Sar ha-Panim, the Face of God revealed.
⸻
Yeshua, the Son of Man, the Sar ha-Panim, the Face of God revealed.
⸻
Endnotes
1. Daniel 7:13–14, The Hebrew Bible (MT); cf. LXX ὡς υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου.
1. Daniel 7:13–14, The Hebrew Bible (MT); cf. LXX ὡς υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου.
2. See esp. Mark 2:10; 8:31; 14:62; Luke 19:10; John 3:13–14.
3. Pelach appears in Dan. 7:14, 27; cf. Dan. 3:12, 17–18 for worship directed only to God.
4. Cf. John F. Walvoord, Daniel: The Key to Prophetic Revelation (Moody, 1971), 160–78.
5. Acts 2:33–36; Eph. 1:20–22; Heb. 1:3.
6. See 1 Enoch 46–48; 4 Ezra 13; b. Sanhedrin 98a.
7. b. Hagigah 15a; Pesiqta Rabbati 20.
8. Mark 14:62; cf. Ps. 110:1.
9. See Exod. 23:20–23; Isa. 63:9; 1 Enoch 40.
10. b. Hagigah 15a; “cutting the shoots” = heretical speculation.
11. Ps. 2; 2 Sam. 7:12–16; Isa. 11:1–4.
12. Isa. 19:20; Hos. 13:4; Ps. 106:21.
13. Siddur Rinat Yisrael, “Sar ha-Panim,” Musaf for Yom Kippur.
14. Cf. Sefer HaZohar, I.22b; Eph. 1:10; Col. 1:15–20.
15. Luke 3:38; Rom. 5:12–19; 1 Cor. 15:45–49.
