The Marys in the Gospel of John (Part One)


Unveiling the Woman Behind the Anointing


While visiting and worshipping at the Milan Baptist Church, I heard a message from Pastor Ivano that stirred something deep—about the moment in John 12, when a woman anointed Jesus at the home of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus. But it wasn’t just the beauty of the act that stayed with me. It was the question: Who was this woman, really?


Was she just a bystander? A grateful follower? Or was there more?

I believe there was. And the more I trace the lines of the Gospel, the more I’m convinced: Mary wasn’t random.

She was part of something hidden, sacred, and close.

She was part of the entourage.

She may have even been part of the family. (I know it may sound too confusing but read on) 


Mary Wasn’t Random: Unveiling the Woman Behind the Anointing
John names her clearly: Mary of Bethany, sister of Lazarus (Jo teaches Lazarus is the disciple “whom Jesus loved” mentioned in the same Gospel). Yet Mary is no passing character. This is someone who knew Jesus well enough to pour nard—expensive burial perfume—on his feet and wipe it away with her hair. That’s not just adoration; that’s intimacy.

In Jewish tradition, gestures like this carry layers:
It was priestly: preparing the lamb.
It was bridal: reminiscent of the Song of Songs (1:12).
It was prophetic: recognizing the death the men still refused to accept.

Only someone within the inner circle could have done this.

The Woman Caught in Adultery – A Veiled Story?
Then there’s the woman from John 8—dragged out, shamed, ready to be stoned. And yet… Jesus stands with her, covers her, restores her. We’re not told her name. But the tradition, early and persistent, linked her with Mary Magdalene.

Coincidence? Maybe. But what if it’s not about confusing women—what if it’s about veiling women?

In rabbinic and mystical tradition, the sacred is often hidden—especially when it comes to women who bear divine witness. Names are withheld, not to diminish them, but to protect intimacy. The closer you are to the holy, the more your story is veiled.

So whether it’s Mary of Bethany or Mary Magdalene—or both wrapped together—these are not disposable characters. They are guardians of memory.

Mary Magdalene: The First Witness
At the resurrection, who is there first?
Mary Magdalene.

She mistakes him for a gardener—but is it a mistake? Or is it Eden, renewed?

She is the new Eve. The first to see the New Adam in the garden.

She calls him Rabbouni. He calls her by name.

If the apostles are the pillars of the early church, Mary is the gatekeeper of the empty tomb.

Entourage or Family? The Hidden Structure
In the first-century Jewish world, discipleship was familial, such a dynastic structure continues to this day in Orthodox Judaism, namley the pacifist Hasidic. There was no divide between spiritual and blood ties when it came to a teacher’s entourage. You either belonged, or you didn’t.

Mary of Bethany’s access, Mary Magdalene’s loyalty, and the women who funded and followed Jesus weren’t exceptions—they were essential parts of the movement.

Which makes sense when you remember: Jesus wasn’t some solitary sage, he was from the Davidic line. He was Yeshua MiNZaret (what good could come from such town).  And later confused with Yeshu haNotzri, a figure remembered (even in hostile texts) as someone with insider access, a name, a reputation, and followers who walked close and confused with Jesus Christ as we Christians know him. Perhaps the Son of Mary Magdalena with Jesus brother Jose Pandera, the anti-Christ.

If anyone knew the real story—its textures, tears, oil, and resurrection light—it was a Mary. Whether His mother or the followers.

What the Memory Protects
The early church guarded Mary’s role, but so did the tradition around it. In mystical circles, she was whispered about as a visionary. In apocryphal texts, she’s a teacher. 

In art, she’s the one clinging to Jesus not in sensuality, but in witness.

She doesn’t ask for explanation. She remembers.

Because she was there.

What about Mother Mary? (Coming in Part Two)
Mary, the Mother of Jesus, stands not only at the threshold of Jesus’ ministry but at the threshold of a new creation. At Cana, she initiates the first sign with quiet authority, echoing the voice of Wisdom that calls the faithful to obey. At the Cross, she endures the piercing of her soul, offering up her son in silent solidarity. And in her hidden presence near the tomb, she embodies the faithful remnant, the suffering Bride, the maternal mystery of Zion.

Mary is not merely a mother—she is the living sign of the Heavenly Jerusalem, the woman clothed with the sun, bearing the pain of birth and the hope of resurrection. Her role is eschatological, covenantal, and cosmic. She does not speak often, because she is the sign—the vessel through whom heaven touches earth.

Conclusion: Not Random. Never Random.
So when we read John 12—or John 8—or John 20—we’re not reading disconnected snapshots. We’re reading theological memory, encoded with love, pain, and truth.

And when we see these Marys there, we should say:

They knew.
They were part of it.
They weren’t random.
They were family.




Postscript: Sacred Memory and Hidden Names

“That which is most intimate is not always spoken aloud—it is guarded, whispered, remembered.”

— Oral Torah principle (based on Avot de-Rabbi Natan)

Zohar Reference – Spikenard and the Anointed King
The Zohar (Vol. II, 63b) reads Song of Songs 1:12 — “While the king sat at his table, my nard sent forth its fragrance” — as a mystical reference to Messiah ben Joseph preparing for his death, and the Shekhinah (the feminine Presence of God) drawing near in sorrowful glory. The oil is not just fragrance—it is the signature of devotion, the sign that someone understands the mystery before it happens.

Mary of Bethany’s act in John 12 becomes a direct embodiment of this mystical moment.

Talmudic Glimpses – Yeshu and the Entourage
In Sanhedrin 43a, the Talmud speaks (cryptically and controversially) of Yeshu the Notzri, noting that “he was close to the kingdom” and that “he practiced sorcery and led Israel astray.” Regardless of the polemic, what stands out is the acknowledgment of his access and impact. He had disciples. He had a name. He had people close to him.

Mary Magdalene may have been one of the most dangerous figures for the memory of this movement—not because she betrayed it, but because she remembered it faithfully.

Apocryphal Echo – The Gospel of Mary

In the Gospel of Mary (Magdalene)—a 2nd-century text that survives in Coptic—Mary is portrayed as the one who understood the words of the Savior better than Peter, and who holds mystical teachings the others didn’t grasp. While not canonical, the text reflects an early tradition that saw Mary not as background but as witness, interpreter, and vessel.

Suggested Reading for the Curious

Harvey Falk, Jesus the Pharisee (esp. his notes on oral tradition and inner circle relationships)

Jacob Emden’s letter on Yeshu the Notzri – surprisingly affirming and nuanced

Rachel Elior, The Three Temples: On the Emergence of Jewish Mysticism

Susan Haskins, Mary Magdalene: Myth and Metaphor

And for theological resonance: Edith Stein’s reflections on woman as bearer of divine memory







Dominion and Dynasty by Stephen Dempster


A Review through the Lens of Torat Edom


Introductory Note

Originally published in 2003 as part of the New Studies in Biblical Theology series (edited by D.A. Carson), Stephen G. Dempster’s Dominion and Dynasty has quietly become a foundational text in evangelical biblical theology. It has stood the test of time—not simply as a thematic overview, but as a structurally sound attempt to let the Tanakh speak in its own canonical voice. Its inclusion in platforms like Logos Bible Software and its continued academic citation confirm its place as more than a passing commentary. It is a sustained effort to read the Hebrew Bible as a coherent narrative—one that many pastors, teachers, and theologians now take for granted.

And yet, over two decades later, the task is not finished. If anything, a book like this shows just how far we’ve come—and how far we still need to go. The recovery of the biblical story is not merely literary or theological; it is covenantal and eschatological. 

Re-reading Dominion and Dynasty through the lens of a reading from Judaism that helps us ask deeper questions: Who carries the testimony? What of the excluded lineages—Dan, Edom, the ger? What lies beyond dominion and dynasty?

This review is not a dismissal of Dempster’s work, but a response to it—a respectful engagement that honors the scaffolding he provided while pressing deeper into the heart of the remnant: the edim (עדים), the witnesses. While related to edah (עדה), the term for a covenantal assembly or community, edim refers specifically to the individuals who bear testimony—those entrusted with the oracles. It is this witness-bearing community, and the prophetic testimony they continue to carry, that still waits to be fully recognized and heard.

A Noble Attempt to Read the Bible as a Story
Dominion and Dynasty is a rare kind of biblical theology: one that honors the Jewish shape of Scripture. By arranging the narrative according to the Tanakh order (Torah, Prophets, Writings), Dempster refuses to treat the Hebrew Bible as a theological appetizer for the New Testament. Instead, he invites us to read it as a story in its own right—structured around seed and land, two central themes of covenantal identity.

This is more than literary elegance; it is a theological act. Dempster is pushing back against atomized Bible reading and calling the Church to reckon with the drama of Scripture. And yet, while he restores much that has been lost, he stops short of seeing the full picture—what Torat Edom calls the testimony of the remnant, the edim or congregation, who carry the oracles beyond the collapse of kingdom and temple.

What is Torat Edom?
Torat Edom—literally “the Teaching of Edom”—is a term I use to describe a theological pattern that emerges when covenantal truth is distorted, inheritance is reversed, and spiritual power is severed from its source. In Scripture, Edom often represents the estranged brother, the rival kingdom, the one who knows the covenant but twists it for control, merit, or empire. Torat Edom is not merely about Esau—it is about what happens when sacred teaching becomes abstract, institutionalized, or cut off from its Jewish root. It is the counterfeit covenant that mimics the structure of Torah but lacks the fire of revelation. Recognizing Torat Edom is not about condemnation—it’s about recovering what has been lost: the living voice of God, the witness-bearing remnant, and the sanctifying power of the Spirit that marks true inclusion into the covenant.

Narrative Strengths: Seed, Land, and Story
Dempster’s central claim is that the Hebrew Bible is a unified story, anchored in two interwoven threads:
  • Seed (zera) — the line of promise stretching from Adam to Abraham, through David, and into the exilic longings of Israel.
  • Land (eretz) — the divine gift that shapes covenantal responsibility, identity, and exile.
These two themes form the backbone of the Bible’s drama: who will inherit the land? Whose seed will carry the promise? In this sense, Dempster’s work is not far from Torat Edom, which also views biblical history as a tension between inheritance and exile, inclusion and exclusion, presence and loss.

His attention to literary seams and genealogical structures reveals a beautiful coherence in the text—especially his insights into the ending of Chronicles as a final “open door” for return and restoration. He also resists the temptation to systematize, choosing instead to trace the storyline as it flows through narrative and poetry, judgment and hope.

Canonical Fidelity: Respecting the Tanakh’s Order
Perhaps Dempster’s most important contribution is his insistence on reading the Hebrew Bible in its own order. Unlike the Christian Old Testament, which ends with the prophetic books (e.g., Malachi), the Jewish canon ends with Chronicles, a theological retelling of Israel’s history that ends with a decree for return. That ending matters. It shapes how we view God’s story—whether it’s about winding down or being prepared for something new.

Torat Edom takes this further by asking: who returns? Who is still holding the oracles when the temple is destroyed, when the seed appears to fail, when the land is desecrated? Dempster gestures toward these questions but does not walk the path. His canon theology sets the stage but does not spotlight the true witnesses in exile—those who carry Torah through suffering, silence, and marginalization.

Where it Falls Short
This is where Torat Edom parts ways. Dempster’s focus on dominion and dynasty, while valuable, leaves little room for those who are disinherited but not forgotten. What about Dan and Edom, whose roles in the biblical story become apocalyptic ciphers for distorted power? What about Hagar and Ruth, outsiders whose stories threaten to unravel the clean lines of “seed”?

Toral Edom argues that these ruptures are not marginal—they are central. They are the test cases of God’s covenantal justice. Dempster treats them as footnotes to the main narrative. That’s the Reformed instinct still speaking—quietly, but clearly.

Supersessionism by Silence?
To his credit, Dempster never explicitly says that the Church replaces Israel. But by focusing on literary fulfillment rather than ongoing testimony, he risks absorbing Israel’s story into a Christological abstraction. The oracles are treated as fulfilled rather than guarded, and the witnesses who preserved them in exile are barely mentioned.

Torat Edom takes a different approach and is a paradigm shift for our theology. It insists that the story is not about fulfillment replacing Israel, but about Edomite captivity, the distortion of covenant through empire and abstraction. Dempster does not critique Christendom, Rome, or theological imperialism. His vision is beautiful—but it lacks blood. It lacks exile. It lacks the remnant’s voice.

Conclusion: A Step Toward the Witnesses, but Not with Them
Stephen Dempster’s Dominion and Dynasty is a bold and noble work. It clears the clutter of systematics to let the Bible breathe again. For that, it deserves high praise. It helps modern readers rediscover the shape of the story—but not yet its full weight.

For those reading with Torat Edom in mind, Dempster is a necessary guide, but not a final voice. He shows us the map, but the oracles still buried in exile speak a deeper truth. Their witness is not found in dominion or dynasty, but in tears, tables, and the long road of return.




You can purchase the book from the following retailers
  • InterVarsity Press: The publisher’s website offers the book in paperback. View on IVP 
  • Logos Bible Software: For a digital edition compatible with Logos Bible Software. View on Logos



How to Read the Bible as a Story – Part 3




Esther


What if history is not only what happened—but what ought to have happened? Chronicles opens that door.

When we read the Bible as a chronological story—not just a devotional grab-bag or theological system—we begin to see how each book arises in response to what came before. The books in this part of the journey—Chronicles, Joel, Malachi, Esther—form a pivot in Israel’s identity. The exile is technically over, but nothing feels finished. The Temple has been rebuilt, but God’s glory hasn’t returned. It’s a time of deep longing, hidden hope, and divine silence.

Let’s follow the thread.

Chronicles: The Holy Revision
Chronicles is often skimmed, mistaken for a repeat of Samuel and Kings. But look closer. It’s not retelling—it’s re-seeing. The Chronicler writes after the exile with a theological goal: to rebuild the shattered identity of Israel.

David is presented not just as warrior-king but as the one who prepares the Temple—a priestly founder.

Solomon is not rebuked for idolatry—he’s idealized as the Temple-builder.

The history of the northern kingdom is almost entirely left out. Why? Because Judah’s Davidic line is the hope of the future.

Chronicles ends not with a king, but with Cyrus, a pagan ruler used by God, issuing a decree to rebuild Jerusalem. It is a prophetic ending: the real King is still to come.

Chronicles teaches us that memory itself must be purified. History can be retold so that the future can be reclaimed.

Joel: The Plague and the Promise
Then comes Joel. The land is devastated—by locusts, by drought, by desolation. It’s unclear whether the crisis is literal or symbolic (or both). But Joel doesn’t explain; he calls.

Declare a holy fast, call a sacred assembly.

Return to me with all your heart… rend your hearts, not your garments.

This is Temple language. Priestly language. The people are back in the land, but they’ve forgotten how to cry. Joel teaches them again.

And then—out of that lament—comes an astonishing promise:
 
Chronicles rebuilt memory. Joel prepares for the Spirit.

And afterward, I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh…”

Malachi: The Last Prophet of the Temple
Malachi speaks in a weary voice. The Temple is functioning, but barely.

Sacrifices are offered, but with blemished animals. Priests are in place, but without fire.

God’s message is surgical:

You say, ‘What a burden!’”
You bring stolen, lame, or diseased animals and offer them.
You have wearied the Lord with your words.

Malachi accuses the people of faith without fear, form without fire.

But he doesn’t end in rebuke. He ends in promise:

Behold, I will send Elijah the prophet… before the great and dreadful day of the Lord.

The story must be prepared again—not by ritual, but by a voice in the wilderness and to heal all our broken relationships!


Esther: God Hidden, Faith Unshaken
And then… the silence. The name of God is not mentioned once in the book of Esther. Not once.

But He is everywhere:
In the casting of lots (purim).
In the sleepless night of a king.
In the courage of a queen who says, “If I perish, I perish.”

Esther shows us how to live when God seems absent. When exile becomes a mindset. When providence is veiled, and yet faith remains.

Esther is the mirror image of Joel:

Joel cries to God in a visible Temple.
Esther walks with God in an invisible exile.


Conclusion: The Long Pause Before the Fire

These four books—Chronicles, Joel, Malachi, Esther—form a tapestry of longing.

Chronicles revises the past to restore hope.

Joel laments the present but promises the Spirit.

Malachi confronts a fading faith with sharp words and final hope.

Esther teaches us to act faithfully even when God seems silent.

Together, they form a threshold.

The Temple has been rebuilt—but the heart of Israel is still awaiting something more. By now, Israel (Jacob) is no longer merely a genetic lineage but has become an expansion—an invitation—to all nations.

This moment sets the stage for the Lord’s dealings with and through two houses:
  • The Hashemites, who may represent a legitimate Edomite–Ishmaelite throne, awaiting reconciliation with Judah. In this sense, Esau and Ishmael find their mysterious role in the completion of the Second Temple through Herod—a flawed yet prophetic vessel.
  • The Hasmoneans, who may symbolize a Levitical overreach into kingly authority—echoing Saul’s mistake, which led to his downfall. Yet through this zeal, the house is spiritually purified by the Maccabees, preparing the ground for a proper reading of the New Testament.
And there is Part 4 coming—to begin unpacking all of this.