“Breakfast where the news is read /
Television children fed…”
—Jim Morrison, “Unknown Soldier —
The Doors”
The screen flickers.
A black-and-white world, orderly and restrained, where Walter Cronkite delivers the evening news with a solemn authority. The static hums, the picture sharp yet distant, as families gather around the warm glow of the cathode-ray tube. There is structure, predictability—a world where truth, or at least the illusion of it, still carries weight.
Then something cracks.
The image distorts, the colors bleed in. The assassinations of JFK, MLK, and RFK play in an endless loop, their grainy footage burned into the collective mind. The jungle nightmare of Vietnam interrupts dinner. Napalm blossoms across the screen in hues of orange and red, as The Rolling Stones wail in the background. Television is no longer a window—it is an altar of spectacle, broadcasting chaos into the living room.
By 1969, the transformation is complete. The screen is now electric with madness. Charles Manson grins in living color, his wild eyes reflecting a world that has spiraled beyond comprehension. Woodstock fades into Altamont, where the music turns violent, and the peace and love dream drowns in the sound of a switchblade slicing through the night. Anton LaVey sneers from a magazine cover, his Satanic Bible now a bestseller.
The children watching are no longer fed—they are consumed.
The TV glows brighter, more hypnotic. By the 1970s, the transition is irreversible. The veil of restraint has been lifted. What was once black and white has become an unrelenting carnival of color—vivid, immersive, and unfiltered.
Truth is no longer delivered; it is manufactured. History is not reported; it is rewritten in real-time. The revolution is televised, but no one realizes they are the ones being programmed.
Breakfast is served.
I was born in 1962 — between the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis — and into a family of Eastern European cultures fresh and thriving in the New world. Our father, a World War II displaced person from the remnants of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, was born on the day Charles Lindbergh crossed the Atlantic in 1927. His next son arrived on the very day John F. Kennedy was assassinated—a moment in history that also marked the passing of the Christian Apologist C.S. Lewis and the Skeptic Aldous Huxley. Then his third son was born when Nixon took the U.S. off the gold standard, igniting the petrodollar system. A family steep in history and attuned to the signals emerging from it.
Thus these are not mere historical footnotes; they are personal markers in a larger story we have lived through, a story of upheaval and transformation.
We watched the world shift from black and white to color—not just on television screens, but in spirit. The assassination of JFK was more than the loss of a president; it was a rupture in history, the removal of a restraint, and the beginning of an era in which deception, lawlessness, and spiritual corruption accelerated at an unprecedented rate.
It is impossible to talk about JFK, the 1960s, and the eschatological alignments of our day without addressing the role of the modern state of you know who. Many avoid the subject, afraid of being labeled or misunderstood, but we must be clear-eyed. The biblical narrative does not revolve around America or Rome—it revolves around the People of the Bible. But the question is: which People?
Was the establishment of the militant Σiovist State in 1948 the fulfillment of prophecy? Or was it a geopolitical project masquerading as biblical restoration? This is not merely a theological debate—it is a question that cuts to the heart of modern history and the spiritual reality we now inhabit.
JFK, Σiovism, and the Nuclear Standoff
One of the least discussed aspects of JFK’s presidency was his opposition to their nuclear ambitions. In the early 1960s, Kennedy pushed hard for inspections of their nuclear facility, suspecting they were secretly developing nuclear weapons. He repeatedly pressed their Prime Minister for transparency, making it clear that he did not want a nuclear-armed militant state in the Holy Land.
Their Prime Minister, who saw their Atomic ambitions as a strategic necessity, resisted. After years of tense exchanges, he abruptly resigned in June 1963. Five months later, Kennedy was dead. His successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, not only abandoned JFK’s pressure on them but became the most pro-Σiovist president up to that point. Under Johnson, The State occupying the Holy Land was able to continue its nuclear program unchecked, and by the late 1960s, it had acquired nuclear weapons.
JFK’s death removed the last major restraint on their military expansion.
If we are looking at biblical patterns, this was a pivotal moment.
Was Kennedy’s assassination a necessary step in solidifying this militant Middle East State as a regional superpower?Did his death mark the point where the U.S. fully aligned itself with their lobby, no longer as a neutral arbiter but as an enforcer of its geopolitical ambitions?How does this fit into the unfolding drama of Gog from Magog?
Ezekiel 38–39 describes a great conflict in the last days, in which a coalition of nations (Gog and Magog) rises against the religion revealed in the Bible. Many have tried to map this onto modern geopolitics, often identifying Russia as Gog. But what if Gog is not just one nation, but a broader system—a power structure that includes Western-backed powers through covert operations in conjunction with such collective militancy as it resides today in the Holy Land?
The 1960s:
When the Restraint Was Torn Away
JFK’s assassination was not just a political event; it was a spiritual turning point.
JFK’s assassination was not just a political event; it was a spiritual turning point.
After his death, the world unraveled at a terrifying pace.
1967: The 666-Day War – Seized Jerusalem and the West Bank. This was hailed as a prophetic fulfillment, but it also marked the beginning of the militant Σiovist State’s deepening control over biblical lands—not as a covenantal restoration, but as a geopolitical maneuver.1967: The Summer of Love – While the occupying state was consolidating power militarily, the West was collapsing morally. The counterculture movement, fueled by drugs, Eastern mysticism, and radical rebellion, swept through America and Europe.1968: MLK and RFK Assassinations – The killing of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy sent a clear message: any leader who sought justice or questioned the power structures at play would be removed.1969: Charles Manson and the End of the Hippie Dream – The Manson murders exposed the darkness beneath the love and peace façade. The same year, Anton LaVey’s Satanic Bible was published, and the occult influence on pop culture became more overt.
It was as if, after JFK’s death, something had been unleashed.
There is no need to futurize this or push it into some yet-to-come apocalypse. This was the apocalyptic breaking-in of disorder—not in a way that awaited some future man of lawlessness, but in the very real, tangible disintegration of moral and spiritual restraint that has shaped the world we now live in. The forces that had once been held back were no longer in check.
This was not some coming deception. The deception was already here.
Which People of G-d or Gog?
The Militant State and the Grand Illusion
This is the most sensitive subject in biblical prophecy discussions. Many Christians automatically equate it with the fulfillment of prophecy, believing that any opposition to such a reality is opposition to God’s plan. But we must ask:
This is the most sensitive subject in biblical prophecy discussions. Many Christians automatically equate it with the fulfillment of prophecy, believing that any opposition to such a reality is opposition to God’s plan. But we must ask:
Is the such a regime the Israel of God? Or is it a political construct that has co-opted biblical language for its own ends?If the real battle of Gog from Magog is about the nations aligning against the the collective return of the four corners, what role does the their current state play in that alignment?Are we witnessing the groundwork being laid for a false messianic expectation—one that will deceive even those who believe they are on the right side?Many assume that Gog from Magog refers to an external attack on them. But what if the real deception is already within?
Jesus warned in Matthew 24:24:
“For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.”
The militant state has positioned itself as the fulfillment of biblical prophecy, but its actions—from nuclear secrecy to its deep ties with Beast driven globalist powers—suggest something else.
This is not about an anti-occupier position, nor a Holy Land regathering as a place of blessing—it is about the need to discern the difference between the biblical covenant and a political project that has used the language of prophecy to advance its own agenda.
The Road Ahead:
Seeing Through the Illusion
When I was young, the world was black and white—simple, structured, and restrained. Then it shifted to color, and with it came an explosion of deception. The change was not just technological; it was spiritual.
When I was young, the world was black and white—simple, structured, and restrained. Then it shifted to color, and with it came an explosion of deception. The change was not just technological; it was spiritual.
Kennedy’s death marked a shift.
The rise of such militancy as a nuclear power and the whole Western war machine marked a shift.
The cultural and moral collapse of the West marked a shift.
We are now living in the aftershocks of those events. The alignments of Gog from Magog are being exposed, not as a future moment of cataclysm, but as the reality we are already in.
But we are not without hope.
We must discern the difference between biblical nd political militant Σiovism. The covenant remains, but that does not mean every political move made by them in name is righteous.
We must recognize that lawlessness has been growing for decades. The restraint that was removed in the 1960s has not returned, and we are living in the consequences of that reality.
We must prepare, not for some distant deception, but for the ongoing battle over truth. The world will not end in an instant—it is already unraveling, and many are blind to it.
JFK’s assassination was not just the loss of a president—it was a warning. It was the moment when the gates were opened, when the shift from black and white to color revealed a world spiraling toward its final confrontation.
Now, we must ask ourselves:
Are we seeing clearly? Or are we still being deceived?
