Noahide laws are nothing to fear but to follow as His disciples (Talmudim). Jesus Christ is Judaism and He provides us the desire and power to follow such a general revelation through the absolute authority of the New Testament which ultimately frames the gospel upon Mt Sinai over Mt. Zion. Futurist speculation aside, they claim that capital punishment results for idolatry, Shittuf, as Christianity now stands under judgment from ‘Sharia, Jihadist’ Judaism. Noahide laws exist to dominate and thus their view descends into caricature with the Talmud as a fundamentalist tool of a minority.
Steve and Jana Ben-Nun claim Noahide Laws are an ecumenical plot for the eventual anti-Christ and the reason for the decapitations in the Apocaylpse. Perhaps futurist (pre-trib Dispensationalism) presuppositions exist, yet what it really exposes is the Zoharist-Maimonidean hegemony upon Judaism (two faith killing ingredients used by the ignorant and nationalist alike fueling political ethnic Israelism from the Ben-Nuns and Michael Brown walking a fine line of ethnicity over religion. Such a common enemy even defines their disagreements. However the Ben-Nuns are directly anti-Zionist whereas Dr. Brown does not align against Zionism as his ‘fine line’ gets even ‘finer’ and nuanced.
Dr. Brown’s questions concerning the Ben-Nun’s ‘authoritiative’ sources are spot on; He calles out the disingenuous Tovia Singer and the Political Zionist Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg who bolster sterotypes of deception. Here, Chabad for these Messianic missionaries emerges as a valid target, yet they are the minority report. All miss to “Obey the Pharisees” as taught by Jesus through Paul. Here Brown and the Ben-Nuns are without the context the Talmud provides. Hence the multiple opinions of the Talmudic system become weaponized by silly propositional textual extraction focused on negative pronounements or opinions that should be rejected by the student (talmudim) of the text as learning device. Yes, “two Jews, three opinions” stands.
However, the apologetics of the Ben-Nuns is so entrenched, with no desire to ascertain history over stubborn divisive narratives. And Yes, “those who know, don’t talk; those who talk, don’t know” as Chabad demonstates along with the Ben-Nuns. Such propogators, really miss the old faith and unity in the ‘cultivated olive tree’ as Hebrews, not Zionistic aspirations whether driven by their respective and rather distorted beliefs. Evil toward Judaism stands as Christianity’s stain for most of the last two millennia. May they discover the two-tiered system (qehel & edah) just like “Jew & Greek, male & female” and the differences among cultures, really finding unity in revelation’s continuity by His easy yoke.
Denying the name of Hashem is actual antisemitism and loving all people is the point. Even Muslims and Arab Christians who also call upon ‘Allah’; a title Jana rejects, implies an ethnically driven replacement theology. A political Zionist orientation blinds vital spiritual realites in the name of a version of Christianity without framing it as a faith or ‘the end of ungodliness’ which is the purpose of moral law.
The Noahide Laws stands as a recent term of an old concept, still used within the last two millennia by Augustine and Sura 42 in The Quran. Therefore coined by those entrusted with the oracles of God as revelation’s promulgators over the promotors of ethnicity or Jewish culture. Sadly, the Zoharist-Maimonidean hegemony of Judaism icontinues and these researchers have much yet to rediscover.
