Noahide Conspiracy?

Noahide laws are nothing to fear but to follow as His disciples (Talmudim). Jesus Christ is Judaism and He provides us the desire and power to follow such a general revelation through the absolute authority of the New Testament which ultimately frames the gospel upon Mt Sinai over Mt. Zion. Futurist speculation aside, they claim that capital punishment results for idolatry, Shittuf, as Christianity now stands under judgment from ‘Sharia, Jihadist’ Judaism. Noahide laws exist to dominate and thus their view descends into caricature with the Talmud as a fundamentalist tool of a minority.

Steve and Jana Ben-Nun claim Noahide Laws are an ecumenical plot for the eventual anti-Christ and the reason for the decapitations in the Apocaylpse. Perhaps futurist (pre-trib Dispensationalism) presuppositions exist, yet what it really exposes is the Zoharist-Maimonidean hegemony upon Judaism (two faith killing ingredients used by the ignorant and nationalist alike fueling political ethnic Israelism from the Ben-Nuns and Michael Brown walking a fine line of ethnicity over religion. Such a common enemy even defines their disagreements. However the Ben-Nuns are directly anti-Zionist whereas Dr. Brown does not align against Zionism as his ‘fine line’ gets even ‘finer’ and nuanced.

Dr. Brown’s questions concerning the Ben-Nun’s ‘authoritiative’ sources are spot on; He calles out the disingenuous Tovia Singer and the Political Zionist Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg who bolster sterotypes of deception. Here, Chabad for these Messianic missionaries emerges as a valid target, yet they are the minority report. All miss to “Obey the Pharisees” as taught by Jesus through Paul. Here Brown and the Ben-Nuns are without the context the Talmud provides.  Hence the multiple opinions of the Talmudic system become weaponized by silly propositional textual extraction focused on negative pronounements or opinions that should be rejected by the student (talmudim) of the text as learning device. Yes, “two Jews, three opinions” stands. 

However, the apologetics of the Ben-Nuns is so entrenched, with no desire to ascertain history over stubborn divisive narratives.  And Yes, “those who know, don’t talk; those who talk, don’t know”  as Chabad demonstates along with the Ben-Nuns. Such propogators, really miss the old faith and unity in the ‘cultivated olive tree’ as Hebrews, not Zionistic aspirations whether driven by their respective and rather distorted beliefs.  Evil toward Judaism stands as Christianity’s stain for most of the last two millennia. May they discover the two-tiered system (qehel & edah) just like “Jew & Greek, male & female” and the differences among cultures, really finding unity in revelation’s continuity by His easy yoke. 

Denying the name of Hashem is actual antisemitism and loving all people is the point. Even Muslims and Arab Christians who also call upon ‘Allah’; a title Jana rejects, implies an ethnically driven replacement theology. A political Zionist orientation blinds vital spiritual realites in the name of a version of Christianity without framing it as a faith or ‘the end of ungodliness’ which is the purpose of moral law. 

The Noahide Laws stands as a recent term of an old concept, still used within the last two millennia by  Augustine and Sura 42 in The Quran. Therefore coined by those entrusted with the oracles of God as revelation’s promulgators over the promotors of ethnicity or Jewish culture. Sadly, the Zoharist-Maimonidean hegemony of Judaism icontinues and these researchers have much yet to rediscover.

👉 Full Presentation

👉 Maybe not Jews but JEWISH

👉 Judaism as Episcopy for Christians?

Missions to Jews

This is a clip from a recent dialog from Moshe Rosen’s “Jews for Jesus”, a group I supported over 40 years ago. Most ‘Jews for Jesus’ consider themselves Messianic ‘Jews’ or better former ethnically lost sheep. 

Those who are sharing their faith in Jesus cast a wide net and are hopefully good listeners as demonstrated here, but they must really stop calling themselves Jews in a religious sense. Granted, one must understand their lineage as ethnicity with the rejection and the trauma Christianity has caused on a collective cultural level that the individual ethnic cultural Jew rejects, thus missing Yeshua Sar Haphanim found in their prayer books. 

Nevertheless, there is so much more to learn as these recent dialogs with Orthodox Jews demostrate.  “In the beginning was the Name, HaShem, ὁ Λόγος.

👉 Orthodox Jews react to Messianics

👉  Framing The Gospel 

👉  Defining Jew

So how must one understand the current nation state of Israel? First, it is not a Jewish State, at least in a religious sense, yet by gene pool, or the framed cultural ethnic reality. Second, it is clear that Zechariah 9:6 may be the only verse that justifies 1948-1967. “A mamzer shall live in Ashdod (the coast lands).” The current borders are an occupation of a gene pool of people that have every right to the land and have perhaps a closer (as some genetic analysis show) tie to the Land.

Just more ‘theologies’ but Hopefully Aiding Some Old Time Religion Revival!

The Protestant Reformation ruptured a Sacramental Tapestry. Martin Luther raged (its time to resist HaSatan) against the Aristotelian hegemony of theology, but what comes around goes around. 

Rome’s Teologia Gloriae transfered to the Teologia Crucis. 

But Romanism struck back with the counter REF and the Baroque period, and it made for nice tourism in the Eternal City, where I served for 7 years. Being an eternal student as a pastor, not in exile, just having a great time with all my Roman Catholic friends; Priests and Nuns (who I could witness to all the time) and my congregation (who were baffeld) and some others while I studied at two Pontifical Universites, one of them turned me on to next classic… 

Thank You Don Bosco Social Communication Friends…

Federico Fellini’s Creepy Extravagant Roman Cat Walk

John Calvin contributed and perhaps tried to salvage Luther’s Theology of Glory as He starts off his Institutes after his preface to the King of France — the newer Calvinists in the USA don’t seem to understand that old Calvinism is ultimately political and the reason Scotland, Holland, South Africa et al as Christian Nations do not exist anymore. Thus a legitimate concern for the doctrines of grace neglect, as his posit of our own self knowledge ‘being’ equal to our knowledge of God is a valid Epistemology:  big WORD for HOW DO we KNOW? Nevertheless, who am I argue with the TULIP where the ‘L’ was put into logic by John Owen.  Does such a formulation help me evangelize? That is the question, and only one that each of us can answer for ourselves.

At least it was a woman, Marilynne Robinson, who I believe holistically interpreted as she calls him, Jean Cauvin,  the French Lawyer and in a more ample direction.  At least in the theologically divided North American context and other places (in a sense) when one says ‘Calvin’,  its becomes a fighting word for debate. Why is that?

Believing Atheists? - Jordan Peterson, Slavoj Zizek and Donald Trump

As a member of the MV Doulos (OM Ships) Training Department years ago and in training others for evangelism, I would use an illustration of how counterfeit money detectors acquired training to detect false bills. Of course, today, we have the technology for such tasks, but back then, the agent would live in a room with piles of real cash for an extended time where 'knowledge became intimate' because the agent knew the 'real thing.' An illustration that stresses the importance of knowing your bible, sound doctrine, and how to be out in the bye-ways of life and share your faith with others. 

In the rotten West, we have many ‘such voices’ talking about faith in God again after a very secular public square where ‘such voices’ were persona non gratia. First, I need not say anything more about ‘such voices’ as Orange Man Bad as his enemies claim. His stunt below during the riots after George Floyd is just that. However, I do not consider the man ‘a racist’ in definition, who knows what he really thinks? Perhaps this points to something sinister?

Clearly, much of what he says concerning the immigration flood is despicable. Thus, from his collective rhetoric, it is clear Trump communicates ‘cultural and national supremacy,’ a bankrupt stance and absolutely not the future, such hegemony from the corrupt West cannot and must NOT resurrect! Unless it serves the other?

Making a nation great in state involves the template of 1 Chron 7:14 that transfers from the individual to the collective:  “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” 

(Update from the assassination attempt on 7/13, 2024) If there is any doubt and this is all not all a ‘Q’ show or inside operation, or ‘back to the future’ as the preponderance of the evidence may suggest. Yes, he was allowed a ‘fist pump’ during an active shooting? A real security detail would have wisked him away, then again ‘who knows?’  From ‘anons to prophets,’ the Trump Show is just flat out creepy! Perhaps, Trump is no longer a practical atheist. For by ‘the twist of head,’ he continues on the world stage and the division and solidification of opinion continues. The Lord have mercy on us all and may we live in Peace! 

Second, Stalinist Atheist Slavoj Zizek continues as an enigma, yet he recently followed through with a new book: “Christian Atheism: How to Be a Real Materialist.”  I surmuse this work continues his most significant posit, i.e. ‘a critique of today's liberal atheists who don't understand religion.’ And as an ancillary, the logically progression into the dead end of the ‘Woke Left” which ironically Zizek misses as well. 

I will let him speak for himself, which is always entertaining or with provocations that cannot be taken seriously. Yet I will say such the ‘Woke Left’ would not have survived Stalin and perhaps Zizek would also have been sent to a gulag for reprogramming. Oh! and let me state a positive word for the former seminarian from the Georgian Republic of the former USSR, at least Stalin gave the Jews a homeland (the JAO) in the far east which is quite nice!

Finally, including the previous, my real 'beef' is with Jordan Peterson, yet not with his recent RC convert wife, thus I ask … "How can someone who has not 'officially' professed faith claim to speak on behalf of it?" So,  we have this recent interchange with Alex O'Connor that makes the point, plus in its aftermath he claims Peterson is an atheist, ‘takes one to know one!’ 

Moral conclusions and hidden pressuppostions aside, the Psychologist Peterson’s game of stepping back into the ‘Western Canon and the Bible reminds me of Robert Pirsig’s classic “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence”, a book I read while in Bible College, and for a paper that was supposed to help me use Philosophy in my Christian Faith. That was more than 30 years ago and I am happy to say, outside of logic everything else is straw or self satisfying posits, nevertheless, my process of jettisoning philosophical systems in light of the ‘Old Faith’ was quite simple, i.e. metaphysics or existentialism. The Latin Church father Tertullian said it best, what does Athens have to do with Jerusalem? Perhaps this was Peterson’s public confession? I don’t know. Yet I pray for all these “wise guys.”

The following is how A.B. Simpson founder 

of the Christian and Missionary Alliance

 finishes his “Old Faith and New Gospels.”

Neturei Kata “Guardians of the City”

Jesus Weeps over Jerusalem Luke 19:41-44

As Jesus approached Jerusalem and saw the city, He wept over it and said, “If only you had known on this day what would bring you peace! But now it is hidden from your eyes. For the days will come upon you when your enemies will barricade you and surround you and hem you in on every side. They will level you to the ground—you and the children within your walls. They will not leave one stone on another, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God.”
Based on Isaiah 29:1-16

Neturei Kata founded before1948 are a Hassidic group (Satmar) perhaps in the lineage as an iteration of the Essenes that made up the pacifist wing of the Hillite Pharisees or temple guardians and most likely the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth. The physical sword made spiritual by the power of His Word!

👉 What is Antisemitism?

When I studied Diplomacy with Norwich University 

Professor Jeffery Sachs was my ‘go to’ guy

Comparing Quran & NT

Bart Ehrman and Javad Hashmi have teamed up on the sacred texts of Christianity and Islam. Hasmi walks the fine line with the Standard Islamic Narrative. Ehrman by claiming that the NT writers were already Christian perpetuates the problem between the two religions common source. A proper understanding of Messianic Noahide Hebrews and the school of Hillel & Gammaliel plus its missiology resolves the origin of both texts. 

👉 Complete Presentation

👉 NT Origins from a Traditional Ashkenazi Perspective

👉 What is Islam?

For my Mama