Arguments Against Judaism: Revisiting C.S. Lewis’ Argument


“ When you are arguing against Him you are arguing against the very power that makes you able to argue at all: 
it is like cutting off the branch you are sitting on.” 

C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (1952)




Cutting Off the Branch: 

Why Rejecting Judaism is 

Rejecting Christ’s Own Fulfillment



Lewis’ point is that rejecting God (specifically, Christ) is self-defeating, because God is the very foundation of reason, morality, and truth. His argument is often used in apologetics to show that secularism, atheism, and moral relativism collapse under their own weight. But Lewis, as a Western thinker, does not press this argument into the Jewish context, where it becomes even more powerful.

This essay will argue that rejecting Jesus as the Messiah is not just rejecting Christianity—it is rejecting the very trajectory of Judaism itself. Judaism, in its covenantal, prophetic, and eschatological vision, was always oriented toward the arrival of the Messiah. If Jesus truly is the Christ, then to deny Him is to deny the very promise upon which Judaism stands—cutting off the branch from which Jewish theology itself grows.

1. Paul’s Testimony: Excelling in Judaism Yet Missing Its Fulfillment
Paul’s own journey is key to understanding this argument. In Galatians 1:13-14, he writes:

“For you have heard of my former way of life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it. And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers.”

Paul was not just a Jew, but one who excelled in Judaism. He was an elite Pharisee, trained under Gamaliel (Acts 22:3), and blameless under the law (Philippians 3:6). If anyone understood Judaism at its highest level, it was Paul.

Yet, Paul testifies that he was missing the very thing that Judaism was pointing toward:

“But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ.”(Philippians 3:7)

This is not a rejection of Judaism but a realization that Judaism’s fulfillment had arrived in Christ. Paul argues that rejecting Christ is not faithfulness to Judaism—it is a failure to recognize its purpose.

2. The Messiah as the Center of Jewish Hope
The expectation of the Messiah is woven throughout the Hebrew Scriptures. Judaism was never just a moral system or a set of traditions—it was always an eschatological faith, looking toward a time when God’s anointed one would restore Israel and the world.

Key Messianic Themes in the Hebrew Bible:

The Seed of the Woman (Genesis 3:15) – The promise of one who will crush the serpent’s head.
The Scepter of Judah (Genesis 49:10) – A ruler who will come from Judah and to whom the nations will submit.
The Suffering Servant (Isaiah 53) – One who will bear the sins of many and be rejected by His people.
The Son of Man (Daniel 7:13-14) – A divine-human figure who receives eternal dominion.

These passages form the spiritual DNA of Judaism. They anticipate a Messianic figure who will not only restore Israel but will bring God’s reign to the whole world.

What Happens If You Reject This Fulfillment?
To reject Jesus is to reject the very foundation upon which Judaism is built. It is like studying the Torah, the prophets, and the wisdom literature—but ignoring their climactic moment.

This is exactly what Paul realized. He was excelling in Judaism, yet missing its very goal:

“For Christ is the goal (τέλος) of the Law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” (Romans 10:4)

If Christ is the goal, then rejecting Him is rejecting Judaism’s own trajectory.

3. Cutting Off the Branch: The Self-Defeating Nature of Rejecting Christ
Returning to Lewis’ metaphor, we can see how rejecting Jesus as the Messiah is not just rejecting Christianity—it is cutting off the very branch upon which Jewish theology stands.

Three Ways Rejecting Christ Undermines Judaism Itself

Rejecting Christ Undermines the Eschatological Hope of Judaism If there is no Messiah, what is Judaism waiting for? 

1. If Jesus is not the fulfillment, then where is the promised King of David?

2. Post-Temple Rabbinic Judaism largely avoids eschatology because without a clear Messianic figure, the hope of the prophets is left in limbo.

3. Rejecting Christ Undermines the Torah’s Purpose Paul argues that the Torah was given to lead Israel to the Messiah (Galatians 3:24).

If the Messiah has come, then continuing to follow Torah without Him is to miss its very purpose. The prophets constantly rebuked Israel for missing the weightier matters of the law—rejecting Christ is the ultimate example of this. 

Rejecting Christ Undermines Jewish Monotheism

Many Jewish objections to Christ center on His divinity.

But the Hebrew Bible already presents a complex unity within God—whether in the Memra (Word), the Shekinah (presence), or the Angel of the LORD who speaks as God.

Jesus does not break monotheism—He fulfills its mysterious depth, which was always hinted at in the Hebrew Scriptures.

4. Paul’s Olive Tree Analogy: Grafting Back into the Root
Paul makes this argument explicit in Romans 11, where he describes Israel as an olive tree:

“Some of the branches were broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root of the olive tree.” (Romans 11:17)

Paul’s point is not replacement but restoration. The Jewish people are the natural branches, and rejecting Christ has temporarily removed some from the tree. But they are not cast off forever—they are invited to be grafted back in.

This further reinforces the idea that Christianity is not something foreign to Judaism but Judaism coming into its fullness.

Conclusion: Judaism Without Christ Is Incomplete and just as well Christ Without Judaism is incomplete

Rejecting Jesus is not faithfulness to Judaism—it is cutting off its very foundation.
The Messianic hope of the Hebrew Bible finds its climax in Christ.
The Torah’s purpose is fulfilled in Him.
The monotheistic mystery of God is revealed in Him.
The Jewish people are not cast away—they are invited to be grafted back into the olive tree through their own Messiah.

To reject Christ is not merely to reject Christianity; it is to reject the goal toward which Judaism has always been pointing. It is, as Lewis said, cutting off the branch on which one sits.

Paul saw this clearly, which is why he was willing to lose everything for the sake of knowing the true fulfillment of Judaism—Jesus the Messiah



👉 YouTube Playlist 

James White Landmarkism Critique Examined



Landmarkism or Baptist Successionism is ‘hot on the trail’ of something yet not taken seriously perhaps because of the ‘gnosticism’ label of some groups. The original texts of The Quran were to convert Persian Manichaean type gnostics into Acts 15 Messianic Noahides. Such information and term ‘gnostic’ should inspire one to examine the same perjorative slung at Paulicians, Bogomills, Abigensians, and mainly Cathars going back into late antiquity.

The litmus test for a gnostic: did they believe that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was evil and the serpent was good? If yes, it was a form of pagan gnosticism not Jewish. Or even to a lessor degree deny The Tanakh or Hebrew scripture’s god of a ‘text only’ religion of the Saducees and successive Kairites. Thus the oral tradition and its Oral Torah significance for the obedience of faith in terms of being righteous through revelation.

Although united to Jews under the umbrella of Orthodox Judaism, Messianic Noahides observing Noahide Judaism throughout the aeon, whether as Paulician Taziganoi, Cozlones or Bogomils, have been more dualistic than Jews. This is because it is safer and easier for the ex-gnostic, ex-pagan and ex-apostate to avoid evil under the concept of what Paul calls “ὁ Θεὸς τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου” which translates into English as “the god of this aeon”. We struggle not against flesh and blood. 

Only the Pharisaical Episcopy is considered protected from the god of this aeon due to extra diligence in obverving all of the Mitzvot of the Torah. Of course, those who fail in extra diligence (mortification and vivafication in Christ) are just as susceptible to his deceptions as anyone else.  The god of this age is the Yetzer HaRa, the Archon of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil with which mankind has been imprisoned ever since the Fall from Grace.

For this reason Messianic Noahides regard Yeshua Sar haPanim as having his own Edenic flesh not having used anything of this world except as one might wear clothing. This Miaphysite view has been mockingly reduced to Docetism by those opposed to Messianic Noahides. 

This spiritual divide of a textual religion from observation and the obedience of faith is an important distinction, but how these group framed the spiritual world often sealed their fate before the religious authorities. Thus ‘pseudognostics,’ as those mentioned in the ‘Trail of Blood’ were simply called ‘dualists,’ but were really simple Messianic Noahides and with no affirmation from Christendom and subject to relentless persecution.





👉 Full Video
👉 Noah the Baptist

Da Vinci ‘De-Code’: Yeshu and Mary Magdala



יז״וש (Yimakh Zikhron U Shemo) Yizush or Yazush or Yezush or Yazosh or Jezus is also known as Yeshu Natzri and Ha-Mitzri (after the Blasphemer of Leviticus 24:10) and Dositheus and Ben Setada as well as Hiram. He is also referred to as Belial in the Teliya and by Paul in 2 Corinthians 6:15 or as Balam son of Bezer in 2 Peter 2:15 and in Jude 1:11 and as polluting the of Pergamum under Satan's throne as well as of course in Revelations 13 and he is the traditional Eastern Yiddish Ashkenazi version of Krampus who appears on the last night of Saturnalia called Nittel. 


Yazosh was the son of Miriam Magdalena and Joses Pantera the (step)brother of Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret. The sea he came from is the Red Sea (the Sea of Edom meaning mamzerim). The 7 letters are the 7 heads (one of which is damaged). The tops of the letters stand for the 10 horns. There are also 10 crowns (crownable letters are only crowned once per noun).התלי was supposed to have been the source of his power. 




The identification of Balaam (Bileam) with Jeschu in a number of the Talmud stories we are considering cannot possibly be held in doubt, will be amply seen from the passages which we are now about to bring forward. As Mentioned above, Yeshu Natzri is identified with Ha-Mitzri. Minchat Y'hudah on Vayiqra 24:11, Chapter 61 says that Ha-Notzri is Ha Mitzri




Can Europeans think? No, Europeans Über - think!


Political theology or ideology is the only way the Western tradition can deal with its destination of modernity, which has sadly infected Evangelicals but most are not so sophisticated. Perhaps the powers that be, dictate the agenda. 

A post-structuralist like Slavoj Zizek, who granted, for a materialist, is trying to understand paradox logically, simply a reduction, but confirmatory in a certain direction. For example, I agree with his critique on the new atheists, and for an atheist himself, rather cute — but his method and sources become the attraction, not necessarily his presupposition that end up with useless conclusions or do they?

Christianity seems to move further away from ‘my kingdom is not of this world,’ and evangelicals are no exception, but that doesn’t mean its all ‘up in heaven or the clouds.’ Nor do we properly understand how ‘to do’ (and together)  the ‘already’ in our hearts in unity —notwithstanding even beginning to understand the ‘not yet.’ Even Christian believers disunity is a far cry from our Lord’s prayer in John 17.

Whenever we methodologically lean on modern or contemporary theologians, we are already in a vortex down into an elusive Hegelian synthesis rejecting mystery, paradox, and the truth of consummate eschatology, Zizek helps to sift through this.
 
Hegel’s left and right played out in 20th-century communism & fascism through the principalities and powers of darkness that divided and conquered us. Why would a believer want to be caught in such a polarity in doing theology as ideology? 

We need to be Book of Acts communists!

Viva La Revelation! 

Zizek & Peterson
Debate


👉Überthinker Meister Eckhart - My Talk with Karen on The Meaning Code whom Zizek understands better than most Christians and engages both with believers  and the Eckhart kenosis “God is dead” theologians of today, through G.K. Chesterton.