Looking Under Every Rock & Tracing the Story of the Eternal Son, Jesus of Nazareth, The Christ and Into the Future
God Fearers: A Concept with a Long History and Many Names
The Most Nefarious Industry
The Islamic Quran affirms Baptists
The Sabians, mentioned in the Qur’an (Surah 2:62, 5:69, and 22:17), have long been a mysterious religious group, often placed alongside Jews and Christians as Ahl al-Kitab (People of the Book). Historically, they have been associated with the Mandaeans, a Gnostic sect with strong reverence for John the Baptist. Their continued existence, primarily in Iraq and Iran, serves as living evidence of early religious diversity within the broader Abrahamic tradition.
The Mandaeans, while rejecting Judaism and Christianity in their later developments, preserve elements of Second Temple-era Jewish traditions and proto-Christian movements that may have influenced, or at least paralleled, the development of early Christianity. Their existence challenges the rigid theological and historical narratives imposed by later Ecumenical Councils, whether in the West (Rome) or the East (Constantinople, Chalcedon, or later Islamic rulings). They provide a counterpoint to the monolithic depictions of religious history, demonstrating that theological development was far from uniform in Late Antiquity.
Islam, in mentioning the Sabians alongside Jews and Christians, indirectly acknowledges the diversity of Jewish and Christian movements during its formative period. This stands as further evidence that early Christianity was not a single, unified institution but a complex network of groups, some of which retained adherence to Torah (e.g., Messianic Noahides), while others evolved into distinctly Gentile movements. Distinguishing between Monophysite and MiaphysiteChristologies, for example, helps to correct oversimplified narratives about the nature of Jesus in early Christian thought, revealing that theological disputes were deeply embedded in regional, linguistic, and cultural differences.
Furthermore, the Standard Islamic Narrative (SIN), which presents Islam as a fully formed theological and political system from the time of Muhammad, is increasingly untenable under modern historical scrutiny. Early Islam was far more fluid, with clear Jewish-Christian influences, regional theological variations, and a gradual development of its legal and doctrinal structures. The acknowledgment of Sabians in the Qur’an, without clear doctrinal condemnation, suggests a transitional religious landscape where distinctions between “Jews,” “Christians,” and other monotheistic believers were not as rigid as later Islamic orthodoxy would insist.
The persistence of groups like the Mandaeans reminds us that religious history is rarely dictated solely by centralized councils or dominant theological authorities. Instead, it is shaped by a web of communities, many of which preserved their unique traditions despite the sweeping political and doctrinal changes imposed by empires and state-sponsored religions. Recognizing these voices not only deepens our understanding of early Christianity and Islam but also challenges the political narratives that have sought to erase or homogenize religious diversity throughout history.
DO this In Rememberance of ME!
👉 YouTube Playlist The Lord’s Supper was not the Passover Sedar
Arguments Against Judaism: Revisiting C.S. Lewis’ Argument
Cutting Off the Branch:
Why Rejecting Judaism is
Rejecting Christ’s Own Fulfillment
Lewis’ point is that rejecting God (specifically, Christ) is self-defeating, because God is the very foundation of reason, morality, and truth. His argument is often used in apologetics to show that secularism, atheism, and moral relativism collapse under their own weight. But Lewis, as a Western thinker, does not press this argument into the Jewish context, where it becomes even more powerful.
This essay will argue that rejecting Jesus as the Messiah is not just rejecting Christianity—it is rejecting the very trajectory of Judaism itself. Judaism, in its covenantal, prophetic, and eschatological vision, was always oriented toward the arrival of the Messiah. If Jesus truly is the Christ, then to deny Him is to deny the very promise upon which Judaism stands—cutting off the branch from which Jewish theology itself grows.
1. Paul’s Testimony: Excelling in Judaism Yet Missing Its Fulfillment
Paul’s own journey is key to understanding this argument. In Galatians 1:13-14, he writes:
“For you have heard of my former way of life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it. And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers.”
Paul was not just a Jew, but one who excelled in Judaism. He was an elite Pharisee, trained under Gamaliel (Acts 22:3), and blameless under the law (Philippians 3:6). If anyone understood Judaism at its highest level, it was Paul.
Yet, Paul testifies that he was missing the very thing that Judaism was pointing toward:
“But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ.”(Philippians 3:7)
This is not a rejection of Judaism but a realization that Judaism’s fulfillment had arrived in Christ. Paul argues that rejecting Christ is not faithfulness to Judaism—it is a failure to recognize its purpose.
2. The Messiah as the Center of Jewish Hope
The expectation of the Messiah is woven throughout the Hebrew Scriptures. Judaism was never just a moral system or a set of traditions—it was always an eschatological faith, looking toward a time when God’s anointed one would restore Israel and the world.
Key Messianic Themes in the Hebrew Bible:
The Seed of the Woman (Genesis 3:15) – The promise of one who will crush the serpent’s head.
The Scepter of Judah (Genesis 49:10) – A ruler who will come from Judah and to whom the nations will submit.
The Suffering Servant (Isaiah 53) – One who will bear the sins of many and be rejected by His people.
The Son of Man (Daniel 7:13-14) – A divine-human figure who receives eternal dominion.
These passages form the spiritual DNA of Judaism. They anticipate a Messianic figure who will not only restore Israel but will bring God’s reign to the whole world.
What Happens If You Reject This Fulfillment?
To reject Jesus is to reject the very foundation upon which Judaism is built. It is like studying the Torah, the prophets, and the wisdom literature—but ignoring their climactic moment.
This is exactly what Paul realized. He was excelling in Judaism, yet missing its very goal:
“For Christ is the goal (τέλος) of the Law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” (Romans 10:4)
If Christ is the goal, then rejecting Him is rejecting Judaism’s own trajectory.
3. Cutting Off the Branch: The Self-Defeating Nature of Rejecting Christ
Returning to Lewis’ metaphor, we can see how rejecting Jesus as the Messiah is not just rejecting Christianity—it is cutting off the very branch upon which Jewish theology stands.
Three Ways Rejecting Christ Undermines Judaism Itself
1. Rejecting Christ Undermines the Eschatological Hope of Judaism
If there is no Messiah, what is Judaism waiting for?
If Jesus is not the fulfillment, then where is the promised King of David?
Post-Temple Rabbinic Judaism largely avoids eschatology because without a clear Messianic figure, the hope of the prophets is left in limbo.
2. Rejecting Christ Undermines the Torah’s Purpose
Paul argues that the Torah was given to lead Israel to the Messiah (Galatians 3:24).
If the Messiah has come, then continuing to follow Torah without Him is to miss its very purpose.
The prophets constantly rebuked Israel for missing the weightier matters of he law—rejecting Christ is the ultimate example of this.
3. Rejecting Christ Undermines Jewish Monotheism
Many Jewish objections to Christ center on His divinity.
But the Hebrew Bible already presents a complex unity within God—whether in the Memra (Word), the Shekinah (presence), or the Angel of the LORD who speaks as God.
Jesus does not break monotheism—He fulfills its mysterious depth, which was always hinted at in the Hebrew Scriptures.
4. Paul’s Olive Tree Analogy: Grafting Back into the Root
Paul makes this argument explicit in Romans 11, where he describes Israel as an olive tree:
“Some of the branches were broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root of the olive tree.” (Romans 11:17)
Paul’s point is not replacement but restoration. The Jewish people are the natural branches, and rejecting Christ has temporarily removed some from the tree. But they are not cast off forever—they are invited to be grafted back in.
This further reinforces the idea that Christianity is not something foreign to Judaism but Judaism coming into its fullness.
Conclusion: Judaism Without Christ Is Incomplete and just as well Christ Without Judaism is incomplete
Rejecting Jesus is not faithfulness to Judaism—it is cutting off its very foundation.
• The Messianic hope of the Hebrew Bible finds its climax in Christ.
• The Torah’s purpose is fulfilled in Him.
• The monotheistic mystery of God is revealed in Him.
• The Jewish people are not cast away—they are invited to be grafted back into the olive tree through their own Messiah.
To reject Christ is not merely to reject Christianity; it is to reject the goal toward which Judaism has always been pointing. It is, as Lewis said, cutting off the branch on which one sits.
Paul saw this clearly, which is why he was willing to lose everything for the sake of knowing the true fulfillment of Judaism—Jesus the Messiah.
James White Landmarkism Critique Examined
Although united to Jews under the umbrella of Orthodox Judaism, Messianic Noahides observing Noahide Judaism throughout the aeon, whether as Paulician Taziganoi, Cozlones or Bogomils, have been more dualistic than Jews. This is because it is safer and easier for the ex-gnostic, ex-pagan and ex-apostate to avoid evil under the concept of what Paul calls “ὁ Θεὸς τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου” which translates into English as “the god of this aeon”. We struggle not against flesh and blood.
Only the Pharisaical Episcopy is considered protected from the god of this aeon due to extra diligence in obverving all of the Mitzvot of the Torah. Of course, those who fail in extra diligence (mortification and vivafication in Christ) are just as susceptible to his deceptions as anyone else. The god of this age is the Yetzer HaRa, the Archon of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil with which mankind has been imprisoned ever since the Fall from Grace.
For this reason Messianic Noahides regard Yeshua Sar haPanim as having his own Edenic flesh not having used anything of this world except as one might wear clothing. This Miaphysite view has been mockingly reduced to Docetism by those opposed to Messianic Noahides.
This spiritual divide of a textual religion from observation and the obedience of faith is an important distinction, but how these group framed the spiritual world often sealed their fate before the religious authorities. Thus ‘pseudognostics,’ as those mentioned in the ‘Trail of Blood’ were simply called ‘dualists,’ but were really simple Messianic Noahides and with no affirmation from Christendom and subject to relentless persecution.
👉 Noah the Baptist